ACME
Soupçons de corruption en Roumanie : le siège de Veolia perquisitionné 15/01/2018 ARCEAU : Gestion de l'eau potable à Lège - Cap Ferret 14/01/2018 Une proposition de loi pour assouplir le transfert des compétences eau et assainissement : quid à Paris Saclay ? 13/01/2018 Voeux 2018 FO Veolia Eau 11/01/2018 La vérité sur le mystérieux Alexandre Djouhri (Veolia, Dassault, Airbus, Libye, présidence de la République française,...) Veolia : Obadia et Djouhri au secours de Frérot et sans parler des autres affaires sulfureuses de Veolia en Roumanie, au Luxemb 11/01/2018 Le dossier de l'eau en Guadeloupe, un scandale 10/01/2018 Forum des lanceurs d'alerte 25 janvier 2018 à Marseille 09/01/2018 Capital 29 décembre 2017 : LANCEURS D'ALERTES : COMMENT ILS ONT OSÉ SACRIFIER LEUR CARRIÈRE 30/12/2017 La journaliste Christine Kelly s'engage pour l'accès à l'eau potable en Guadeloupe et organise une distribution d'eau minérale demain à Pointe-à-Pitre : depuis 3 ans avec les comités d'usagers locaux et Eli Domota nous nous battons sur cette question 23/12/2017 En 2018, huit communes de Metz-Métropole intégreront une régie publique commune d’eau. Pour Montigny et ses voisines, elle remplacera la Saur. L’idée est d’avoir un meilleur service pour moins cher 23/12/2017 Extrait du compte rendu de l'AG ordinaire de l'ACME-France du 19 décembre 2017 22/12/2017 Tous nos voeux pour 2018 22/12/2017 21 décembre 2017 : Accord au Parlement sur la proposition de loi assouplissant la Gemapi : L'entrée en vigueur de nouvelles compétences Gemapi, initialement prévue au 1er janvier 2016, avait été repoussée au 1er janvier 2018. Comme prévu dans le text 21/12/2017 SEDIF Syndicat des Eaux d'Ile de France (président des 150 communes depuis 1923 A Santini) et son délégataire Veolia depuis 1923 21/12/2017 Mucem de Marseille 25 janvier 2018 : La nuit des idées FORUM DES LANCEURS D'ALERTE 20/12/2017 Les eaux de France toujours plus polluées 18/12/2017 LOI NÔTRE Le transfert des compétences eau et assainissement reporté jusqu’en 2026 15/12/2017 Ordre du jour non communiqué sur le site de Paris Saclay du conseil communautaire de Paris Saclay du 20 décembre 20h30 à Orsay avec 67 questions et plus de 1 500 pages à lire (un simulacre de démocratie) et cet ordre du jour nous a été communiqué par 14/12/2017 ARTE mardi 12 décembre à 23h25 Jusqu'à la dernière goutte "Les guerres secrètes de l'eau en Europe" réalisé par : Yorgos Avgeropoulos 12/12/2017 GUADELOUPE 1ère : Les avocats mettent les pieds dans l'eau 09/12/2017 ENQUÊTES POUR CORRUPTION: LAFARGE, AIRBUS, VEOLIA, HSBC... L'ÉTAU SE RESSERRE SUR LES ENTREPRISES FRANÇAISES 09/12/2017 LES CRAPULES DE LA RÉPUBLIQUE le 9ème livre (210 pages) de R Lenglet et JL Touly chez First 08/12/2017 Convocation ASSEMBLEE GENERALE ORDINAIRE BI-ANNUELLE DE L'ACME-EAU POUR LE 19/12/17 08/12/2017 Affaire du SIAAP Syndicat Interdépartemental d'Assainissement de l'Agglomération Parisienne épure l'eau de près de 9 millions de franciliens depuis 1970 06/12/2017 Marianne 5 décembre : SIAAP (Syndicat Interdépartemental d'Assainissement de l'Agglomération Parisienne) : Soupçons de favoritisme autour d'un marché des eaux usées attribué à Veolia 05/12/2017 Suez, Dijon et son président PS proche de Macron François Rebsamen une histoire touchante mais pour qui ? 02/12/2017 EAU ET ASSAINISSEMENT : RÉPONSE MINISTÉRIELLE CONTRADICTOIRE AVEC LES ANNONCES DU CONGRÈS DES MAIRES (30/11/2017) : S'agissant des communautés d'agglomération, ces deux compétences eau et assainissement restent optionnelles jusqu'au 1er janvier 2020 01/12/2017 Le Cercle Français de l'Eau véritable agence de lobbying des multinationales de l'eau ? 30/11/2017 Les guerres secrètes de l'eau en Europe (France, Allemagne, Irlande, Portugal, Italie, Grèce) 26/11/2017 Thomas Joly président du Syndicat Intercommunal d'Assainissement de la Vallée de la Bièvre, vice président de Paris Saclay à l'eau et l'assainissement et maire de Verrières et Veolia dans Planet Veolia novembre distribué au congrès des maires de Fran 23/11/2017 Suez à Paris ! 23/11/2017 Les guerres secrètes de l'eau en Europe (France, Allemagne, Irlande, Portugal, Italie et Grèce) documentaire grec de 58mn diffusé sur ARTE le 12 décembre 2017 à 23h25  23/11/2017 Comme chaque année au congrès de l'Association des Maires de France, Veolia invite le mercredi 22 novembre 1 500 maires à déjeuner et à écouter le PDG de Veolia dans une salle privatisée à la Porte de Versailles à Paris 22/11/2017 Rapport Suez 2016 assainissement Wissous : expresses réserves quant à la sincérité, l'exactitude et la complétude du contenu de ce rapport annuel d'activité et recours à l'assistance d'experts technique, financier et juridique pour lever ces réserves 21/11/2017 Eau: Lège Cap-Ferret les usagers de la presqu'île ont-ils été lésés ? 17/11/2017 Ordre du jour du conseil communautaire de Paris Saclay 22 novembre 20h30 à Orsay avec 55 questions 16/11/2017 Management décembre 2017 : lanceurs d'alerte 16/11/2017 Les guerres secrètes de l'eau en Europe 16/11/2017 Une start up dépose trois plaintes pénales visant Veolia 16/11/2017 La Dépêche 16 novembre : après 60 ans Exit Véolia, bienvenue Agur et bonjour les économies sur la facture d'eau 16/11/2017
           
Communiqués de Presse syndicalistes et politiques

Lettre d'El Alto (Bolivie) à la Banque Mondiale pour stopper la privatisation de l'eau

Letter to the World Bank, Inter-American Development Bank, and KFW calling on them to stop promoting the privatization of Water.



EL Alto, 5 April 2005

Mr. James D. Wolfensohn
Mr. James D. Wolfensohn
Mr. James D. Wolfensohn
President of the World Bank
Mr. Enrique V. Iglesias
President of the Inter-American Development Bank
Mr. Hans W. Reich
President of the Board of KFW
Re.: Need to change the conditions of International Cooperation.

Dear Sirs,</center>

We are writing as representatives of more than 80,000 residents from the City of El Alto in Bolivia, who for more than 8 years have challenged and acted to overturn the privatization of drinking water in the city of La Paz and El Alto, due to their negative consequences for our community and our rights as citizens. We are writing to you because the international organizations which you lead, have supported and promoted the concession of our water supplies to the Aguas del IIlimani company, which includes its principal shareholders: the transnational French company Suez and IFC of the World Bank.


The aim of this letter is to show the grave mistakes that have been made in the process of privatization, to call for reflection and ask - in both a respectful but very firm way - that international aid should not be conditioned on the continued involvement of the private sector in the provision of drinking water either by Suez or any other private company in El Alto or La Paz.

The support that the international aid community gives, which is based on the contributions of citizens of countries in the North, should be used to resolve poverty and in particular enabling access to water, and not as a means for providing business opportunities for private and transnational companies.

The main mistakes of privatization

1)
  • The privatization of the Municipal Water and Sewage Authority (SAMAPA) for La Paz and El Alto was part of the conditions imposed by the World Bank, IADB, and IMF on Bolivia in negotiations on external debt relief in 1996.
    2)
  • Only one company, Aguas del Illimani-Suez, made an offer at the tendering stage. Despite this, and instead of arranging a second tendering, the terms of reference were changed and the company's bid was accepted. The organizations that you lead supported this privatization process with different loans and financial support to the Ministry of Capitalization and SAMAPA to prepare it for privatization.
    3)
  • Before SAMAPA was privatized, the water rates were dollarised. In 1996, the rates increased between 21% and 51% in different categories. At the same time as the awarding of the contract, rates rose again by 19%. In the eight years of privatization, rates rose 35% in Bolivian pesos due to the devaluation of our national currency. To this we must add, that privatization established the highest commercial rate ($1.18 dollars per cubic meter) for water provided to the public sector, i.e. schools, hospitals, parks and other state facilities.
    4)
  • During the process of tendering, it was said that privatization would be a way of attracting private investment in order to increase access to water services. Carlos Yeregui, legal representative of Aguas del Illimani, said to the press on 27 June 1997, that they would ”invest 80 million dollars in the next 5 years and 350 million dollars in the 30 years of the concession.” But when they signed the contract, they changed their promises of investment in terms of new connections.
    5)
  • The contract established a guaranteed profit of 13% for the private concession.
    6)
  • The contract guaranteed a double payment to the private concession for its investment. On the one hand, Annex 10 of the contract said that the calculation of the rates could be made taking into account the costs of operation and maintenance, depreciation, investment and profits. On the other hand, clause 26.3 stated that termination of the contract for whatever reason would require payment worth the value of the company's net fixed assets.
    7)
  • Despite these irregularities and abuses, you granted credits, to Aguas del Illimani and the World Bank (through the IFC), so that it could be an associate with the company with an 8% share.
    8)
  • The primary responsibility for the signing of the contract lies with the Ministry for Capitalization, the Superintendent of Water, the Municipal Government and the National Government, but we must ask: Why did you make no comment or question the contract before becoming associates and granting credits to Aguas del Illimani?
    9)
  • The organizations which you lead presented Aguas del IIlimani as a great example to the international community, and publicized the “Condominial System” as a “pro-poor” solution. Even this failed dismally in El Alto because it is not possible to establish a second-rate sewage system that runs through properties and allows feces to flow back into houses. We invite you to come to El Alto and see what has happened with this “condominial system” and understand why they didn't extend services to the rest of the city. We may be poor but we still have dignity.
    10)
  • At the end of the first five years (1997-2001) Aguas del IIlimani did not complete the promised 71,752 drinking water connections that were agreed in the contract with El Alto. They only achieved 52,000. Aguas del Illimani argued that the residents did not link to the network and that it wasn't their responsibility. So with the complicity of the Superintendent of Primary Health, they changed the criteria from number of connections to that of coverage, that is to say that they were responsible for the area covered by pipes even if residents weren't connected. Aguas del Illimani publicised to Bolivia and the world that they had reached “coverage” of 96% in El Alto.
    11)
  • Aguas del Illimani said that they invested approximately 50 million dollars during this first five years, that is to say 30 times less than what they had announced publicly before gaining the concession. Nevertheless, what stands out is that the majority of this investment was money from the World Bank, IADB, KFW and CAF. In other words: the privatization did not bring new money from the private sector as had been promised. Instead it was the international aid community that provided between 70 and 80% of the investment for Suez-Aguas del Illimani.
    12)
  • During the negotiation of targets for expansion and rates for the second five-year contract (2002-2006), Aguas del IIlimani and the Superintendent of Basic Health agreed, initially, that the private concession would deliver 15,000 new connections outside the area served by the company but inside the area of the concession within the city of El Alto. But then, Aguas del IIlimani asked for a rise in rates for consumption of water of 25%. As a result of a poorly transparent process, the company agreed with the Superintendent to a rise in rates of 12.5%, along with a rise in costs for connections and a reduction in the afore-mentioned new connections. As a result of this, the rates for connections to drinking water and sewage systems rose to between $335 and $445 dollars, which is the equivalent of nine minimum wage salaries in Bolivia.
    13)
  • These two decisions (the rise in rates for connections and the elimination of 15,000 connections) affected 208,000 people, which was noted in correspondence sent by the Superintendent Ing. Franz Rojas to the Manager of Aguas del IIlimani on 5th January 2005.
    14)
  • As Aguas del Illimani announced that it wasn't going to make new investment in the second contract 2002-2006 (according to reports by Ficht Raiting), the State law Nº 2642 was passed on 9 March 2004, in which the State granted concessional credits and international aid donations to Aguas del IIlimani. The Swiss government made a donation of $3 million dollars covering 13% of Aguas del IIlimani's fixed profits and the World Bank, European Union, KFW and IADB announced that they would provide further resources for Aguas del IIlimani.
    15)
  • Faced with this situation, the Federation of Neighborhood Committees of El Alto (FEJUVE) reiterated its demand for the end of the contract with Aguas del Illimani, a demand that was approved by all our congresses since 1997. For us, it is absolutely unjustifiable that more than 200,000 people should remain without water in order to guarantee the profit rates for Aguas del Illimani or that international aid cooperation for the poor should be used to enrich transnational companies.
    16)
  • After exhausting all possibilities for dialogue, we started an indefinite blockade of El Alto on the 10th January. On the 12th January, the Government passed a special decree ending the contract with Aguas del Ilimani explaining that: “the Government has responsibly taken the appropriate actions to revise the contract with the aim of meeting the needs of the population of the city of El Alto and to enable the extension of service to the 200,000 people who need service, after exhausting all approaches to the Company Aguas del Illimani S.A.” In a speech on 6 March, the President of the Republic of Bolivia said: “I believe that Aguas del Illimani did not play clean with El Alto, I believe that Aguas del Illimani did not fulfill the key objective of its contract, and I believe that we had to revise the contract, and as Aguas del Illimani did not want to do this, that the contract had to be ended.”
    17)
  • To begin with the municipal governments of La Paz and El Alto and the national government considered the possibility of temporarily returning the utility to the hands of SAMAPA until a new company was formed together with residents and neighborhood associations of both cities. However this possibility was blocked by pressure from the international aid community which conditioned the continuity of new loans on the establishment of a “mixed society,” public-private company, in which the shareholders of Aguas del Illimani could participate.
    18)
  • In a communiqué to the press on 3 March 2005, the Germany Embassy stated that the continuation of international cooperation depended on: 1) The existence of an “amicable solution” to the conflict with Aguas del Illimani which avoids the payment of indemnities and 2) the establishment of a mixed enterprise. Literally, the communiqué said: “Without these conditions, it will be impossible to fulfill our financial support for tackling the problems of water and sanitation for El Alto.” Why does Bolivia not have the right to initiate legal action against this company if the conditions for an amicable termination are unacceptable especially if there are a series of irregularities and unfulfilled commitments by the aforementioned company? Is it because the World Bank is a shareholder in Aguas del Illimani through the IFC? Why does the model for a new company always have to include private participation that exploits nature to seek a profit.
    19)

El Alto on its feet, never on its knees.

Lettre d'El Alto (Bolivie) à la Banque Mondiale pour stopper la privatisation de l'eau


Abel Mamani – President, FEJUVE El Alto
Eliodoro Equiapaza – Vice-President
Jorge Chura – Secretary General
Manuel Olivares Tito – Secretary for Transport and Communication
Eugenio Huanca – Secretary for Housing
Rafael Mamani – Secretary for Human Rights
Mercedes Condori Quispe – Secretary for Land
Adolfo Puma Morales – Secretary for Conflict
Fortunato Calcina – Secretary for Popular Participation



LES LIENS SUR LE REFUS DE SUEZ EN BOLIVIE


Lettre d'El Alto (Bolivie) à la Banque Mondiale pour stopper la privatisation de l'eau

Lundi 25 Avril 2005
Vendredi 31 Mars 2006
JEAN-LUC TOULY
Lu 3799 fois

Dans la même rubrique :

Les leçons de Suez - 10/03/2006

1 2

Communiqués de Presse d'Anticor | Communiqués de Presse d'ATTAC | Communiqués de Presse de la CACE | Communiqués de Presse de France Libertés | Communiqués de Presse de S-EAU-S | Communiqués de Presse de transcub | Communiqués de Presse syndicalistes et politiques

Mentions légales
Pour une recherche d'articles par thèmes, cliquez sur le mot de votre choix !
actions juridiques adhésion affaires troubles afrique agences de l'eau agriculture algerie algues bleues algérie angleterre anti-gaspillage argentine arnaques ? asie assainissement assainissement non collectif associations associations en lutte australie banque mondiale barrage barrages ben s'mim biogaz bolivie bordeaux bretagne brésil canada castres cge chili chine coca cola cognac colloque colloque 2006 colloques 2006 compteurs condamnation contentieux contrats contrats en contentieux corruption corse cyanobactéries danasi dessalement droits de l'eau déchets eau embouteillée eau potable ecocide edf enel film financements de projets france-libertés fuites fusion gabon gestion alternative grenelle de l'environnement guerre de l'eau inde investissement islande israel l'europe de l'eau las vegas les antilles lille lobby lobbying loi oudin santini loi sur l'eau luttes lyon maladies mali manifestations marché de l'eau maroc mauvais rendement messier mexico 2006 mexique mortalité médicaments neufchateau niger nitrates nucléaire observatoire parisien paris pascua lama pauvretés perou pollution pollution de l'eau pollution de l'eau potable pollution des nappes pollution eau potable pollution minière pollutions pollutions agricoles pollutions de l'eau pollutions des nappes pollutions des rivières pollutions industrielles portraits ppp privatisation prix de l'eau proglio pérou pétition que choisir? quebec quimper radio radioactivité rechauffement climatique remunicipalisation renégociation réchauffement climatique réunions publiques santini saur sedif services publics à vendre services publiques à vendre solutions suez suisse sécheresse tentatives remunicipalisation toulouse touly unesco université de l'eau uruguay usa varages veolia veolia orient, l'affaire vivendi véolia zimbabwe écocide